Episode 139 – Jim Gives Update on Rumble, Bitchute Lawsuit, and More 8-26-25
TRANSCRIPT
-
Hello, everyone, and welcome to another edition of All ThingsReconsider.tv with myself, Jack Mullen, and Dr. James Fetzer. Seems like time’s going so fast, I just said this a couple of hours ago, and here we’re doing it again. But anyway, it’s again another Tuesday.
-
in the United States of America, as it was formerly known. I don’t know what you would call it today, but it’s moving very slowly towards some sort of police state, tyranny.
-
And a massive downsizing population, but we’ll get to these things. Jim, how are you today?
-
I’m ecstatic, Jack.
-
I just got notification from my insurance company, which is Outstanding USAA, and my roof, which is over 25 years old, which was hit by hail.
-
oh, a month or two ago, they’re gonna give me 20 grand to put on a new roof. It’s gonna cost me all 500 bucks. Jack, I’m very happy to have you!
-
I’m very happy, I’ll just tell ya.
-
Roofs have really gone up in price, haven’t they? I mean, you used to be able to get a roof on for grand.
-
Well, see, it just happened, my neighbor had his roof redone because of hail damage, and I was very impressed. This company started at 8 AM, they were done by 11.30. The whole roof! 11.30!
-
I must have been all Mexican guys.
-
I think it is, Jack! I think it is! They were just so good! So I tied them all up with the same company, so I had them come and look at my roof, and they went up there, and you know, they gave me some rough numbers, and blah blah blah blah, and they said, you know, make the insurance claim, and you’re deductible, and we’ll…
-
We’ll take care of the rest, and …
-
It’s panning out exactly that way.
-
And I’m just… I’m just ecstatic, because Jan, my wife.
-
was complaining that I had to get the official estimate before, and I said to her, it didn’t matter. It didn’t matter. In fact, no more did they get contractor’s estimate. The company just sent it their own adjuster.
-
So it didn’t matter if I talked to them before or not. I mean, they didn’t, you know… I wanted ballpark figure, and he gave me a ballpark figure of 18 grand, and that’s just how it’s coming out.
-
Yeah.
-
Yep, and you get it done real quick, the Mexican’s gotta be to another house and have it done by 4pm, you know? I believe it.
-
What can we say, Jack? What can we say?
-
I don’t know. Anyway, I can say that Americans don’t put roofs on anymore, and that’s one thing I see all over the place.
-
I’m telling you, they were wonderfully professional.
-
And the tile they put on is… got kind of a reddish…
-
Hugh, and I’ve been thinking about my house, how it would look better if it had the reddish shoes. I’m gonna have the same time, it’s gonna look really, really sharp.
-
And this was an old roof, you know? Right. So, that’s even after depreciation, because they’ve got to factor all that in. So, I’m just… I’m just…
-
Super happy.
-
Especially my… my wife is quasi-relieved, because she won’t believe it until it’s all said and done, so she’s… she’s one of those. You gotta…
-
Prove it to me! Show me the money!
-
She wants to see it on TV first. You know, Nixon said nobody believes anything in the U.S. unless it’s on TV first.
-
Now, on this other front, this, ….
-
Let’s go to that. Let’s introduce.
-
Yeah, I think we started talking about it last week, didn’t we start talking about it last week?
-
Yes, yes, yes, your lawsuit against Rumble and BitChute regarding Victor Hugo Vacca’s attacks on you.
-
Exactly. So, it hadn’t happened then, but they launched…
-
their first wholesale attack on me, Jack. I mean, it was massive. They put together 195 different, …
-
URLs that they thought were really, really good. And I’ve… I have a guy who’s deep intel, he says they are really, really good, but…
-
They’re gonna be sympathetic to me rather than to him. So he did this massive thing, he was attacking me, I was an idiot, I was a fool, I hadn’t made the filing fee, the hoping was a joke and a sham.
-
and Jack, they just didn’t know what they were talking about! It’s just wonderful that they make this big to-do. I mean, it’s all in big caps, red letters, all this stuff, you know, a sailing me.
-
And they’re wrong! I mean, I paid them a filing fee! I mean, they just literally didn’t know what they were talking about. I just love it, because it gave me the opportunity to pull the rug out from under them, and also to introduce to this very impressive collection of 195…
-
Individuals and organizations Moving down.
-
Yeah, that’s my response. You want to go to their attack first, but that… that’s all the people. Yeah, that’s my response, Jack. Go further down. Yeah, there you go.
-
There you go, right there, for immediate release. Go up one more, just a tad. Well, back down, back down, back down, yeah. There you got it. For immediate release, this is the attack.
-
The court has denied Jim Fetzer’s Informa Papyrus petition in his order to pay $405 before his $60 million lawsuit against Rumble admits you can move forward. In other words, it was never filed
-
On August 12th.
-
The court has likely determined that the action of filing a $60 million lawsuit against Rumble and mid-shirt is both frivolous and malicious. Fetzer has until September 5th.
-
to pay the filing for $405 in order for this case to move forward. If Fetzer fails to do so.
-
he will be held to have withdraw on this action voluntarily, and the case will be closed without prejudice. The following is a copy of the signed doc, and yeah, this is a…
-
I was sent the letter. I mean, it’s there in the record, because I did… see, what… keep going, and I’ll explain all this as we go forward.
-
Turn those… you want me to turn those images on?
-
Yeah, yeah, sure, go ahead. Yeah.
-
Huh, at the very top, someplace.
-
Usually, it lets me flip images on, but now I’m not seeing that here anyway.
-
Yeah, it’s not important. It’s just a… it’s just a letter from the court.
-
Okay, well, we’ll keep going.
-
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, let’s see here, …
-
Thanks, there it is, you’re good. Thanks to the Investigative Work of VP, and I have no idea who VP is, but they… they mocked up Jack!
-
Who gave Victor this information? The following is from their research. Victor.
-
If you Google research on Fetzer’s case number, you’ll read all the info. Please note.
-
The online copies of this case do not have the caption at the top of the pages of the case document, because he never filed the case. He never paid the $450 to the clerk to file. The judges give it him until
-
September 5th, to pay the money to have the case filed. All filed cases have the caption right across the top of the page of a filed case, any case number, document number, page number, etc. Fetzer is bluffing.
-
I’m also almost 100% certain this psychopath will not pay the money, and the case will be closed. VP!
-
The following is a statement from Werther.
-
Pay your court filing fee before September 5th, 2025, so you can get this… we can get the discovery on your facts, you have, sir. Put your money where your mouth is. Now that the court has denied your claim of being a pauper.
-
So that the court of public opinion will be able to witness for themselves in a court of law during a jury trial. Only provable facts matter. How much of what you dribble out of your foul mouth is fact?
-
And what is your discredited opinion based, and what he really means to say, and which of your discredited opinions are based on lies?
-
You and your gang of fools have tarnished your legacy forever. You have opened a can of worms for yourself you’ll not be able to close, not only for you, but for all those around you.
-
Information about all of you is coming out as you dig yourself deeper into the hole you’ve created for yourselves in your own words, both in emails and on video, all of which stand up as evidence in a court of law as discovery.
-
once James Fetzer stopped playing pauper and pays the court fees so he can take his ridiculous court pine before a judge and jury instead of making him pretend that Fetzer’s actually filed a court case when in reality.
-
Petzer hasn’t done shit, but run his line mouth respectfully.
-
Victor Hugo Vaca second. This breaking story. Yeah, well, go up to my response now, Jack. I mean, I found this so amusing. Yeah, there you go, there you go. Okay, well, look at… go up to this wonderful, impressive list he has of, …
-
195.
-
And one of my colleagues Has gone through this list.
-
And he says it actually is a very impressive list, and these are anti-war people. I don’t know why Victor put together this list, but actually, it looks as though it’s gonna work in my favor. In any case, scroll down and we’ll say here, all right, there.
-
Why can you zoom in a little more, Jack? Make it just a tad easier to read?
-
Why vodka is… yeah, just a… just a zoom in, just a zoom in.
-
Yeah, but I don’t have a zoom in on this thing. Oh, okay. All right, that’s okay. Here we go. Here we go.
-
Why vodka is Kaka?
-
How we know for sure.
-
There is a standard procedure, good. There’s a standard procedure for filing cases in the federal courts, where, if appropriate.
-
A self-representing litigant may file a proper petition to circumvent filing fees because of their indigent status.
-
with a $1 million lien from my Dane County Sandy Hook case, which I carried to the U.S. Supreme Court, and currently have 4 appeals pending.
-
I submitted such a request, which was denied.
-
So I ponied up the filing fee of $450 for the BitChute, Deep State Protocol Zinc, and Rumble cases to be filed, copies of receipts below.
-
What we have here is a classic example of the vodka style.
-
Take some word, phrase, or expression out of context, and exaggerate it grossly to make it easier to attack. Balka has done that from the beginning.
-
when I first removed him from Truth vs. News and from the raw deal, fearsome, foursome editions. That was done from maliciously attacking Brian Davidson, who had simply excused himself
-
from further participation with VACA, for his repetitive and ongoing mantra. It’s the Jews, it’s the Jews, it’s the Jews.
-
These days, his gross oversimplifications claim I am trying to suppress freedom of speech.
-
When I am only holding Rumble and Richute to account for not adhering to and enforcing their own terms of service.
-
Anyone who reads the complaints and statements of claims knows that to be the case. They are a matter of public record. So what’s going on here?
-
An effort to destroy me has now become an effort to destroy the alt-truth community. His vicious, sadistic, and malicious videos now number 715+.
-
Just go to Bitchute Victor, Hugo, comment, Jim, Victor, you can see it for yourselves.
-
My Sandy Hook friends have told me that Sandy Hook Promise hired Victor to destroy my reputation out of concern that my Dane County lawsuit might be reversed.
-
As Dave Geherry has astutely observed, a precocious 7-year-old could look over a few dozen caca covers and define him as a defamer and a scoundrel. Everyone here can judge for themselves.
-
If Vodka wanted to create an enormous audience for making a fool of himself, he and his sock puppet Jane have succeeded spectacularly.
-
review the court filings for yourselves. And this is all on my blog.
-
Legal documents concerning the case against Rumble. You can find it in Justia Pacer. Download the docs from my blog, Legal Documents, case against BitChute Deep State Protocol LLC here. Justia Pacer, download here, Summary.
-
Fat, sir.
-
A former Marine Corps officer and McKnight Professor Emeritus from the University of Minnesota at Duluth.
-
Flag the content, serve the platforms with cease and desist notices, and filed affidavits with the court. Sign examples of the abuse and specific violations.
-
of both the user agreements and the law. The platforms have refused to moderate the content or respond to the complaints, prompting Fetzer to file suit this month.
-
The forbids you didn’t rumble to comply with their own user agreements with regard to unlawful and hateful speech. Link, where you can see it on my blog, contact.
-
For more info or interview requests, contact Jim Betzer directly by 4608-354-4280, or email at…
-
JFATs are at d.umn.edu, and scroll to the bottom.
-
I attach the receipts for my filing fees. There they are. Right, there’s the first, and notice it’s dated August 12th.
-
And that’s the one for, Deep State Protocol BitChute. And then 2 days later, because I… I had to get the other 405,
-
Rumble for on the 14th, but there they are, Jack, and there they are. So I… I love that these guys didn’t know what the hell they were doing.
-
They got carried away, they were so eager to attack me, they made complete fools of themselves before a very distinguished list of
-
Individuals they selected.
-
who my… my parties believe are gonna be very sympathetic to me. I mean, what’s your take, Jack? We can… yeah. Your thoughts?
-
I think you do.
-
Victor stepped in some caca there, ….
-
That’s what I think, yeah!
-
He definitely was a little ahead of himself there with the horse. I think it’s interesting you got that entire email list. Normally, he would block those, but you know, that was generous of them, so that you could re-email all that stuff back.
-
Yes.
-
This guy’s clearly a psychopath.
-
Hit a BC instead of a BCC jack, exactly.
-
Yeah, yeah.
-
And he’s insane. I mean, so only an insane person would do that. I mean, he’s so boisterous, I don’t know what the word is aggressive.
-
that he fails to take simple precautionary, you know, procedures into account. And so he shows his hand while he’s blowing all this out of his face.
-
And, so with respect to that particular part of it, you know, this thing was clearly your victory in this little back and forth. The real question is whether Rumble and BitChute will actually
-
even bother to, you know, respond to this. I don’t know how that goes. If they don’t, you do. You get another chance to come back after them again with some other proceeding, right?
-
Yeah, no, here’s the deal.
-
it hasn’t been docketed. In other words, a court
-
Hasn’t put it on the docket with a time schedule. As soon as that happens.
-
I think they’re gonna be eager to settle, because they’re gonna see their goose is gonna be cooked. Now, here’s the deal. Why hasn’t it already been docketed?
-
Right.
-
in the terms of service with Bitchut and Rompole. They say anything.
-
Contesting of their rule halls.
-
must be settled by arbitration in the state of Wyoming, in the one case in Florida, the other.
-
Bop!
-
Well, that’s generally true, if they are complicit.
-
If they have materially contributed to the defamation, the harassment, and so forth.
-
then that’s obviated, and that’s my argument. So I supplemented my complaint when the court notified that it was contemplating the question of
-
jurisdiction. Does the Western District Court of Wisconsin have jurisdiction to handle this? So I submitted a three-part explanation. We can look at one of those, Jack. They really…
-
I think nail it.
-
Because, look, if they’re able to go to arbitration, they got a big company, arbitration’s not public, it’s private, they can repressure, and it’s… the public will never know!
-
And they’ll get away with trivial. It’s only because this’ll be public, and going to a jury trial, not arbitration, that I can make a difference here.
-
And it’s interesting.
-
that two of my colleagues had an AI assessment done of the prospects, and it was totally objective.
-
Totally objective. I was astonished. When they first shared it to me, I thought maybe it’s gonna say, well, you know, fat chance, Fetzer, you’re just blowing a lot of smoke, but that is not what it said, Jack.
-
I’ve sent to ya.
-
I, I, I find this really fascinating.
-
… Is there any way you can compress it from the side so it’s easier to read? Anyway?
-
No, I… I don’t know, let me see.
-
I mean, I’ve tried to make it bigger.
-
Get it out of full… get a… we don’t want full screen on that, Jack. Take it out of full screen, if you can.
-
Yeah, I don’t, I don’t have it in full screen. It’s just showing.
-
Wow.
-
It’s covering the whole screen here, of course.
-
Yeah, I see that. It says you’re sharing a screen, but I didn’t actually… see, it’s inside of a browser’s front end, ….
-
Yeah.
-
Yeah.
-
I can bring it up in another document format.
-
Yeah, why’d you do that? Bring it up in another, because this is going to be too hard to read.
-
But this, this situation, like, you know, one of the things he said about you last week is that he associated you with a pedophile. I mean, these are not just, you know.
-
Oh, yeah.
-
Yeah.
-
These are very defamatory.
-
Oh, yeah!
-
Oh, they’re outrageous!
-
Yep.
-
Look, he claims I threw my lawsuit in here in Dane County when I carried it all the way to the Supreme Court and still have four appeals pending. How outrageous can you get?
-
He accused, ….
-
He accused one of my colleagues of molesting his granddaughter and giving her herpes. He took another, a wonderful woman, quite brilliant, and these are people he’s attacking because they spoke up on my behalf.
-
Who delineated reasons why he was wrong, and he took a photograph of an old naked woman and put her face on it.
-
And get this, Jack, I may have mentioned this last week.
-
He learned that my mother had committed suicide. So now he’s publishing, he’s posting that I may have murdered my mother. I mean…
-
Yeah, give me a break! I mean, this is pretty disgusting stuff. That’s why I think if it gets me for a jury…
-
And Jack, all you have to do, as Dave Geheria observed, even a 7-year-old kid.
-
You look at all those covers, and you realize, this is grotesquely abusive.
-
Yep. Bye.
-
You’d think I could convince a local police department here, but we got a female chief of police who doesn’t want to touch it with a 10-foot pole.
-
Because I believe there are criminal charges here. Ivan sent her a list of 7 or 8 Wisconsin statutes that he’s violating Jack, and she doesn’t want to pursue it. I mean, what the point of…
-
a police force if you won’t pursue violation of laws against the residents of your community.
-
What about your sheriff?
-
Wisconsin.
-
Jack, I hadn’t even thought of that. That’s brilliant.
-
That’s what he verified.
-
Oh, look at that. Thank you, Jack.
-
That’s why you were looking at him.
-
Excellent, I love it.
-
Yep.
-
Okay.
-
Here we have.
-
Okay.
-
AI assessment of our lawsuit against Michute Deep State Protocol LLC in Rombo, first.
-
Reliance on Section 230 Protections.
-
Both platforms likely lean on Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act, which generally shields online platforms from liability for user-generated content. However, this protection is not absolute.
-
If a platform is found to have materially contributed to the creation or development of unlawful content, it could lose that immunity. Second.
-
automated moderation systems.
-
Complaints suggest that moderation decision may be made by AI bots rather than human reviewers, leading it to questionable judgments about whether plague content violates terms of service. This can result in
-
harmful videos being deemed compliant, even when they contain clear defamation or privacy violations. This is so exact and spot on, Jack, I love it. Now, remember, this is coming from AI.
-
Right.
-
Third, inconsistent enforcement of terms.
-
Both Bitchute and Romble have community guidelines that prohibit defamation, doxing, and other harmful behavior. Yet.
-
Lawsuits allege that these platforms fail to enforce their own rules, allowing flag videos to remain online despite repeated legal complaints.
-
When questioned about liability.
-
Yes, they might be found liable, but it depends on several legal nuances. While platforms like BitChute and Rumble often invoke Section 230 to shield themselves from liability for user-generated content, that protection has limits.
-
Here’s how liability could come into play.
-
When platforms might be liable.
-
Failure to act after notice.
-
If a platform is repeatedly notified about defamatory content and does nothing.
-
Especially after receiving formal legal complaints or cease and dismiss letters, a court might find that it acted with reckless disregard and negligence. Both of those are true here, Jack. I sent… we sent multiple complaints about videos, they ignored them.
-
We also sent cease and desist letters to them both, which they also ignored.
-
Encouraging or amplifying harmful content.
-
If the platform’s algorithms or editorial choices actively promote defamatory material.
-
It could be seen as contributing to the harm, which weakens the Section 230 defense. Remember, I’ve already mentioned they altered the algorithms, so if you search for Jim Fetzer, you get Victor Hugo on Jim Fetzer instead.
-
Violations.
-
Yeah, I think that’s a killer, Jack.
-
violations of their own terms. If a platform claims to prohibit defamation, but fails to enforce those rules consistently, how about, say, 600 or 700 times?
-
Yeah.
-
Might argue the platform is engaging in a deceptive practice or breach of contract. Yes.
-
Refusal to remove after court order.
-
Once a judge rules that content is defamatory, platforms are expected to comply. Refusal to remove such content could lead to contempt of court or further legal penalties. Real-world examples.
-
Rumble has faced lawsuits alleging it ignored takedown requests and allowed harmful videos to remain online.
-
BitChute has been criticized for hosting content that violates privacy and defamation laws, with some cases escalating to legal action. So, yes.
-
If a plaintiff can show that the platform knowingly allowed defamatory content to persist and contributed to the harm, liability becomes a real possibility.
-
Challenges plaintiffs will face.
-
Section 230, Defense.
-
Platforms are generally protected from liability for user-generated content unless they materially contribute to it.
-
Courts are often reluctant to erode this protection without clear evidence. But the evidence here is not clear and compelling, it’s in massive quantity.
-
Burden of proof.
-
Plaintiffs must move that the content is legally defamatory, not just offensive or misleading. That’s a high bar, especially when public figures are involved. I’m not concerned about
-
not meeting that standard. We can’t do it, and it’s obvious. Free speech framing.
-
Rumble, for example, positioned itself as a free speech platform and has countersued critics for defamation, arguing that attacks on its moderation policies are politically motivated, not here, not here.
-
So while plaintiffs have a compelling narrative and some legal traction, success will hinge on whether they can prove that these platforms cross the line from passive hosts to active enablers of defamation. If they do, it could set a major precedent.
-
Yeah.
-
Well, it’s still a high bar, given that, A, you’re going to… even though we can see that they’ve modified their algorithm, you’ll have to have somebody who’s, aware of how algorithms work.
-
as your, … as somebody who actually is an expert witness, because just for you and me to say that’s the case, they could simply say, no, it’s not. But we both know that that’s not the way it works.
-
Jack, put us back on, we don’t need… Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
-
I was just reading it to keep going.
-
I’ve already got witnesses doing affidavits to that effect, Jack.
-
Good.
-
And in Discovery, they gotta reveal their algorithms and what they had in the past. They can’t hide here. With Discovery, I can have them expose every damn video they ever had about vodka and what they did about it, how many complaints they got.
-
about my cease and desist orders, about my… here’s a key thing, Jack, and I mentioned this last week, but it bears repeating.
-
The affidavits I filed with the court.
-
And sent to them.
-
Were not contested or disputed.
-
That means they have legally forfeited the right to contest them. They have, in effect, admitted or acknowledged them to be accurate.
-
I think it was a huge mistake on their part.
-
They thought they were being clever, because I wasn’t doing everything properly.
-
But I’ve sent him the affidavits!
-
My intent was to file a motion for a default judgment if they didn’t respond. Well, that’s what’s gonna happen here.
-
If, as you surmise, even after the case is docketed.
-
They don’t respond. I’ll file a motion for default judgments.
-
And that means they’ll lose the case.
-
By failing to respond.
-
But I’m telling you, Jack, the evidence in this case is so massive.
-
the offenses are so egregious, I think they’re gonna wanna settle. They’re gonna wanna settle. They say, Mr. Fetzer, Dr. Fetzer, what’s it gonna take?
-
to keep this out of court. I… I think, Jack.
-
And I ain’t gonna treat them easily.
-
I think $59 million would be a good word for them.
-
That’s fine.
-
That’s 30 million punitive, and as we’re filing for 10 mil.
-
But punitive can triple it to 30 apiece. That’s where the 60 came from. But see, that’s Vacca’s style. He didn’t say I was soon a pretend pill, which is what I’d originally announced. He wants to take everything and exaggerate it as much as he can to make it easier to attack, right?
-
Right. So….
-
And he’s not even explaining that’s $30 million apiece, because of triple damages, because of their complicity and failure to take corrective… he will never explain any of that, see?
-
He doesn’t even understand trouble damages, so I’m sure he did….
-
I think it’s very interesting what he does or does not understand, but it appears this is… He…
-
I did a wonderful interview with Dr. Catherine Hort, and she’s a PSE particle physicist from Oxford.
-
famous woman. She’s been fighting… Against or on behalf of targeted individuals.
-
in the courts, and I mean, she’s… superb.
-
an intellect.
-
And it was just incidental, before we did an interview last week, that I mentioned to her, she asked me how I was doing, and I was explaining that.
-
Well, I gotta deal with this lawsuit with this guy. She didn’t know anything about it! So, she started looking at it. When she started looking at all the videos, she said, right off the bat, those are AI-generated covers.
-
AI-generated covers. They’re too many, they’re coming out too fast. She’s gotta be right. And she was saying she thinks that this is an FBI operation, and Vaka’s the front guy. And I’m… I’m telling her, I think, no, it’s actually Mossad.
-
I don’t think it is FBI. I actually think it’s Mo Saad.
-
And as I explained there, my Sandy Oak friends told me that Sandy Oak Promise had hired Victor to attack me, because they’re worried that my lawsuit
-
maybe reversed, and it might cut off the gravy train where they’re making a million bucks a month, Jack, on Sandy Hook. They’re still making a million bucks a month!
-
Right.
-
Well, it’s a huge scam. I’ve always been the big… Alex Jones was never that big a threat, except he had a huge audience. I was the one bringing together the experts, producing the evidence, and you know.
-
I sought to intervene in all these cases, the Remington case?
-
Alex Jones in Connecticut case, Alex Jones in Austin case, as an expert witness.
-
None of them wanted me, Jack. None of them wanted me. The insurance company were more eager to give up 77 mil than they were to have me expose the whole thing was a sham. Why?
-
I’m convinced because they think, in the end, it’s gonna lead to insurance for holding weapons, handguns, rifles, and they’re gonna make billions!
-
Trillions!
-
of a gun insurance. So they’re all in. They didn’t want a guy come in here and explain why the whole thing was a sham, that was a FEMA drill, that nobody died.
-
And, of course, with both Alex Jones and both his cases, they were… all these cases were rigged.
-
Mine included.
-
My San Diego friend told me all the cases had predetermined conclusion. We’re talking about 4 cases. Remington, Alex, Connecticut, Alex, Austin, Meade, Dane County. All 4.
-
Right. They were all institutionalized lootings, too. I mean, all that money went to, you know, individuals and people and organizations that
-
were simply standing in line with their cup out, because they knew that they were going to drain these companies, like Remington.
-
Who were from the top down, not necessarily from the corporation inside.
-
involved with this. I mean, they’re a player in this disarmament game. And that’s because these companies got taken over. You know, they were infiltrated, and then their, executive, officials were then all occupied by people who have a
-
you know, probably go to the church with a little hat on every week. So, I don’t have any doubt that you’re correct there. There’s no doubt at all. And this whole thing with Sandy Hook is eluding beyond belief. It’s a… it’s just a massacre of public, you know, offering.
-
In fact, it has so many facets you would not believe.
-
If you want to understand how bad it is, because Richard and Rumble.
-
Are part of a very complex operation that spans the globe.
-
And it has deep roots.
-
And it’s really a part of the control mechanism. Under the freedom of speech, just as Vaca claims, he’s a champion of freedom of speech, they can commit censorship, defamation, harassment, all kinds of grotesque actions, and claim immunity. Impunity. He’s got it.
-
He’s become even more outrageous, Jack. I think he put out…
-
a dozen or 24 videos, a dozen in 24 hours, he’s gone batshit crazy. I think he… I think he is batshit crazy, but there it is.
-
Yeah, buddy.
-
Putin’s correct, though. AI can generate that shit, and they can make videos in moments. I mean….
-
Right.
-
I’m so right.
-
Come out of there like they’re making muffins from a muffin machine.
-
And it’s funny about that phrase, because when I was in court here in Dane County.
-
The Alex Jones trial in Austin, Texas, began the very day they took my book and my blog.
-
And I thought that was a remarkable coincidence, and then I heard parts of the trial!
-
And he has this… There’s a producer for InfoWars who’s asked to read a message from Paul…
-
Joseph Watson in London, you know, I thought he was a good guy.
-
And read it, and it says, we gotta stay as far away as possible from that batshit, crazy fencer.
-
Well, see, there wasn’t a huge audience, right? So everyone said, whoa, whoa, whoa, what’s this batshit crazy offensive guy just saying? They banned the book, they took the book, they took my blog the very day that happened. That’s why they did it!
-
So you couldn’t find out. You go to my blog now, as you well know, jameshfetzer.org, just do a search on Sandy Hook.
-
You can learn what the hell actually happened. But they took the blog with that timing sequence, so when they’re bringing it up in court, nobody can figure out what the hell they’re talking about.
-
Regarding this batshit crazy fat, sir. I mean, it’s really…
-
outrageous, but it was that closely coordinated, Jack. This is a really interlocking conspiracy!
-
Yes, it is.
-
In my primary motion to reopen the case.
-
August or September lasts. It’s a motion…
-
To, open sanctions pursuant to extrinsic fraud and fraud upon the court.
-
The extrinsic fraud, being the… false depiction of the FEMA drill as a mass murder.
-
The fraud upon the court included presenting it inside the court as a real then, and then bringing in a witness who was an imposter witness, and a…
-
and so many other things, where he excluded all my evidence. Judge Ashley ruled
-
Whether or not anybody died at San Diego wasn’t relevant to the authenticity of a death certificate for someone who allegedly died at San Diego. Jack, how blatantly absurd can you get? I mean, that was not only logically, but legally absurd.
-
And also it is….
-
not only legally absurd, but logically absurd. If nobody died, then obviously there can’t be an authentic death certificate for someone who was a victim for an event that was not a mass shooting. Unless, let’s just say, stepped on an electrical cord while he was performing his
-
his role, but that would be an accidental death. This one said died from multiple gunshot wounds at Sandy Hook Elementary School, ba-ba-ba-ba.
-
Right. But you can see by the fact that… simple fact that they got away with that by introducing it entirely as a fictional play, as just some sort of television show, that there isn’t any way in which the court system can function anymore. It’s been crippled, you know, in a…
-
in a way that makes it no longer of any value, and that’s what worries me about the whole thing. Obviously, you’ve covered everything properly, and you can’t get much exposure on it, but they go to great lengths to be certain you cannot.
-
And, you know, they’ll spend any amount of money, as I’ve said before, it’s one of the largest, probably most vulnerable Achilles’ heel, the whole, concept of gun control has. If this would fall apart,
-
Everything will fall apart relative to it. And the people that would be exposed by this, not only the state of Connecticut and all of their players, and Senator Blumenthal, and every one of these crime bosses that were involved, all the way up to Obama, Bozo, and the rest of it.
-
Right?
-
And so.
-
Obama Holder, this was an Eric Holder, Barack Obama….
-
Yep, yep, yep. I mean, Janet Napolitano’s probably in there. I mean, this thing is just a seething mass of potential embarrassment and system collapsing information.
-
And so, anyway, it’s been amazing to be part of watching you try to go after this Goliath as a David, with a rope with no rock on it. But the thing is, you know, there’s nobody comes out of the woodwork to help you in the slightest bit.
-
And this is the same theme we see everywhere. We’ve got people like the CSPOA with Sheriff Mack, for example, who’s working to try to make sheriffs understand and the people understand, that there’s a way to stand in front of this if you get this individual out there, but they can’t get any donations. But you take a… you take any leftist bullshit donation, I mean, operation in this country, and you’ll see…
-
They’ve got billions of dollars come in from people like George Saros and the Sandy Hook scam. Imagine what Sandy Hook would donate to something that would be anti, …
-
anti-CSBOA, or anti-sheriff, constitutional sheriff, which is what they come after. They use… I mean, they’ve got people writing books. A woman named Jessica Pishka’s got a book about the county sheriff being
-
you know, a infiltrating, anti-American, unconstitutional, democracy-destroying individual. Every one of those things is an inversion of reality. It’s all the truth upside down. Everything that we claim, they take and turn around and make it their argument.
-
And, that’s what you’re facing, and it’s an amazing thing. I hope…
-
that at least you get something out of this. If nothing else, they make that bastard shut up. You know, they won’t produce or print another one of his documents or his videos. But, you know, as far as them coming up with money or in any way showing that you’re correct, boy, that’s gonna be a hard road hoe.
-
Well, Joe, Jack, it’s all there, the evidence is there, I… I submit it.
-
Tony Hook.
-
Read the statement of claims. I’m talking about all the evidence we got. It’s massive! It’s detailed. This is the most stunning example of its kind in world history!
-
You guys made over 750 videos attacking me?
-
Give me a effing break, man! I mean, this is humongous!
-
Yeah. And it reflects either….
-
a lunatic at work, or a psyop.
-
Of a rather… Profound character. In a way, you got the combination of both here.
-
Yes.
-
Well, we have nothing but psyops in our entire civilization now. I mean, everything that’s on television is PSYOP. All the movies, every bit of information that comes out of Hollywood, everything going all the way back into history. I have a little quote here I want to read to you from 1882. It’s only slightly germane, but it does make a point, and I’m going to bring it up right now.
-
about how this Jewish-controlled environment that we live in is never ending in its undermining of humanity.
-
And it’s workings around the clock to discredit and destroy all things that especially white people, and then under that, subcategories of whites that, you know, classify themselves as Christians and so forth, simply because that’s what white people do. And so this is from 1882.
-
And this is after, … the Tsar, Nicholas, or Alexander III,
-
his government was under attack by the Jewish Bolsheviks, and of course, we’re 40 years away from the Bolshevik takedown, subsequent total destruction, but this is the sort of thing that happens in time, and I’m saying as a psyoff.
-
Tsar Alexander III was so infiltrated with the Jews for the role in assassination of Alexander II, which was his…
-
cousin or brother, I’ve forgotten now, …
-
And, I think it was his brother, and… but they couldn’t both be Alexander. It had to have been cousin. Anyway.
-
he made this comment. Now, also concomitant with this was the, the, …
-
The Jews had withdrawn financial support for the Tsar as a result of the fact that this assassination had occurred, and the Tsar had gone
-
to, great lengths to expel the Jews. So he threw them out, he put them in this part of Russia that was designated for the Jews. It was quite large, I mean, I think it’s larger than most of Europe, because it’s up there in that massive space. But they had this area they were confined to, and he sent them all back there.
-
Well, as a result of that.
-
the Jews attacked it financially, as they do every time they’re put into a position in which they are caught, and they’ve done the same thing in the United States. They destroyed the financial system when needed, as they did in 1929. But anyway, for some time, the government has given its attention to the Jews and their relations to the rest of the inhabitants of the empire, with a view of ascertaining the sad condition of the Christian inhabitants brought about by the conduct of Jews in business matters.
-
And I gave you a little background on that. During the last 20 years, the Jews have gradually possessed themselves in not only every trade and business in all branches.
-
but also of a great part of the land by buying or farming it. Very little farming did they do personally, though. They don’t work. With few exceptions, they have as a body devoted their attention not to enriching or benefiting the country, but to defrauding, by their wiles, its inhabitants, and particularly its poor inhabitants. This conduct of theirs has called forth protests on the part of the people, has manifested in acts of violence. The government, while on the other hand.
-
doing its best to put down the disturbances and to deliver the Jews from oppression and slaughter has also on, has also on end
-
On the other.
-
On the other hand.
-
Yeah, on the other end, I was missing something. To end the….
-
thought it a matter of urgency and justice to adopt stringent measures in order to put an end to the operation practiced by the Jews on the inhabitants, and to free the country from their malpractices, which were, as is known, the cause of the agitation.
-
Exactly. So, here we have, a long time ago.
-
the same kind of situation that would apply even today. I mean, we have this group of people that have come in, taken over, manipulated every natural system of government and institutions, medicine, education, science.
-
You name it. They’ve come, taken it over, manipulated it, and created, basically, a system of psyops
-
where everything that they tell us is a lie, every bit of information. I mean, look who runs the world now. Look at the kind of people like Elon Musk, for example, that run
-
Run space programs that don’t exist, that show us, you know, spacecrafts doing impossible things.
-
Yeah.
-
And, you know, we look at….
-
Of course, when we can’t even get to the moon, for God’s sake!
-
Oh, yeah, they’re going to Mars, and … it just becomes….
-
Pain!
-
there’s nothing we can do. It messes with your head to the point where you have to understand that nothing coming out of this system is anything but a total fabricated lie. And that’s the sort of thing you see with Trump right now. He’s got, what, troops heading towards Venezuela. They tell us it’s about fentanyl. It’s not about fentanyl. It couldn’t be. It has to be about oil or some other, you know.
-
large macroeconomic situation, and they’re going to go there and do whatever they want to do, kind of the way the U.S. government did.
-
I had 4,000 Marines that make a difference when Maduro can muster 4.5 million militia? I mean, it’s idiotic. This guy’s foreign policy is all effed up. I’ve never seen a worse president in terms of foreign policy than Donald J. Trump.
-
No, he definitely has no clear concern for foreign policy, and it’s as though he doesn’t have to worry about that. It’s like that this thing is so well scripted now, and so many people
-
I mean, every nation on Earth followed the COVID, you know, example and the protocol, and so…
-
it says to me that this whole thing is a scripted play. This thing with the Ukraine, when we have Putin and Trump gonna work it out and go to Alaska, then they somehow break off like it didn’t work out, and then Trump’s back to, you know, supporting Ukraine again. And we hear today that,
-
that now we’ve got definite evidence that Ukraine was involved with the Nord Stream pipeline destruction.
-
And nothing’s gonna come of that. You know, we’re seeing that Germany’s supposedly mobilizing 10,000 troops. Well, that would automatically imply that Putin’s gonna have to use military… or he’s gonna have to use nuclear weapons and blow up Europe, and …
-
And Go ahead.
-
10,000 dead men walking, Jack.
-
Yeah, but I don’t think that it’s gonna happen. I think it is about it being a PSYOP. I guess a PSYOP is the… the word of the day. I mean, we’re supposed to believe that this thing hasn’t already blown up into a mess. I mean, who’s gonna keep putting… if you’re Putin, are you gonna keep putting up with… with that clown homosexual
-
piece of Jewish garbage sending
-
drones over to destroy your power plants and blow up your bridges and undermine your civilization on a regular basis, or are you going to take your amazing military and just waste that place in just a couple of minutes with all rights in your favor? Because, I mean, they definitely have gone out of their way, right, not to
-
to escalate this any faster than normally would be expected. I mean, they’ve gone way out of their way to do nothing about it, in my opinion.
-
And so, anyway, I don’t know what really is… who’s controlling the world, but to me, it seems like the whole damn thing is a…
-
is a PSYOP, while at the same time, you know, over in the Middle East, we have more PSYOPs going on. We have
-
Benjamin Netanyahu and his gang telling people that a bioweapon attack is coming, to Yemen, and that the plague of the firstborn is coming, you know, where they go through this made-up story of Purim, and try to make some biblical reference to,
-
you know, the ancient, Exodus situation with Israel. Anyway, I’m going to show you this… I’m sure you saw that, that ex-tweet, or whatever they call them now, I don’t know what the hell they’re called, but…
-
Hang on a second here, I gotta stop talking and find my share button.
-
But we have, you know, we have this cats clown, bioweapon attack coming, Israeli Defense Minister Warren Jamin, plague of the firstborn coming, you know, and so the average American doesn’t even know what that means. But it doesn’t sound good, because it’s got the word plague in it.
-
made a stunning threat today to the country of Yemen. Today, we brought up the Houthis… brought upon the Houthis a plague of darkness and gloom. There will be, also a plague of the firstborn. And then, of course, he made this… this in, you know, it’s….
-
These are things I’m not aware of. Go back, it says they destroyed the Houthi presidential palace, … Yes. No, no, yeah, further down, further down. Right there, right there, right there, right there.
-
Yeah, they went… they, they attacked… they attacked Yemen, and it was in response, they said, to some attacks that the Houthis had…
-
launched against Israel. For every missile they launch towards Israel, the Houthis will pay with compound interest. So they went there, although they were, shocked that their weapons didn’t do as well as they thought, because the Houthis have some sort of
-
protection that they must have purchased from Russia or somebody, China, who knows? But anyway, they didn’t get their missiles to do what they wanted. However, they did get.
-
Go ahead.
-
get them to land, you know, in certain places like Presidential Palace. But there was no one killed there, as far as I know, that was related to the president.
-
Fascinating.
-
So, you know, so Hal goes through the biblical Exodus story here, and this story is made up. Now, the Exodus is a clear event, but it had little or nothing to do with the Jews, because they put themselves in the history of the Israelites. They weren’t in that history, although they were a tribe then.
-
But at the end, when the Israelites were all driven out of Israel, they stole their history and then put themselves, the tribe of Judah, in the place of the Israelites. That’s how they became the Israelites. And they really are not the Israelites, they are the tribe of Judah. But anyway, in this story, in Passover.
-
Let’s see, I think Hal says it pretty well here.
-
He explains it. The plague emphasized God’s sovereignty, highlighted the importance of faith and obedience. The plague of the firstborn is central to the Exodus narrative.
-
The Israelites were instructed to sacrifice a lamb, smear its blood on the doorposts, those poor lambs in Israel, and eat the roasted lamb, which would cause God to pass over their homes, sparing them… sparing the firstborn. And the firstborn then were all supposedly, you know, gonna acquire this.
-
Mere blood on their door, Paul.
-
Causing God to pass over their homes.
-
Yes, that’s the story of Passover, that’s what that means.
-
Wow.
-
O.
-
And so then they have a festival, you know, about this every year, where they… they… they celebrate the death of all the non… of all the children and stuff that were firstborns, except for the ones that got the blood of them. Those were, you know.
-
well-informed, the, God’s chosen people might come up with it. So they got, you know, they didn’t have to put up with the death, but the rest of them did, and the Jews were happy about that. And they have many, many, …
-
ceremonies where they, you know, the story of Esther, for example, when the 76,000 soldiers that were killed because Esther turned
-
… you know, caused them to kill her husband, who was king, whatever the hell he was. And, …
-
And then she was able to sneak the Israelis in, and they got to kill all the soldiers. Anyway, these stories, they’re terrible stories, and fortunately, they’re made up, but that’s what the Israeli children get to grow up hearing.
-
And thinking these stories are real, and… but you can examine them from the point of view of ancient history that exists, and then….
-
Fight for the Houthis.
-
safe.
-
It’s long been supposed Israel not only has a stockbile a nuclear weapon, but chemical and biological. My impression is they’re going to use a biological weapon on the Houthis. Am I wrong?
-
Well, that’s what that argue… that’s what they’re arguing there. And, you know, we can’t say that’s not true, because they have the capability of doing amazing things with biological weapons now. All kinds of stuff, stuff that seems to be crazy. I mean, look, there’s things happening to animals in this country that never have happened in our lifetime or recorded history for some of it. I mean, they have rabbits starting to grow horns and…
-
Getting these little points coming out of their faces, and there’s many examples in other species, like the deer and so forth.
-
Or, you know, and then we’re hearing about spiders that are being attacked by fungi, and that’s causing them to have their brains taken over, and then they go march in groups, which they don’t do, and they come away from their nests, and so forth.
-
I mean, all sorts of biological things are happening, and we… I believe, personally, that they have, with the, you know, with their plans, the ability to do amazingly terrible things to humanity by dumping poisons on them. And, not just snake venom, but all kinds of stuff.
-
So, yeah, you know, maybe that’s predictive programming along that line, but…
-
It’s… it’s just… it’s just part of this thing that the Jews, are…
-
an endless burden to society. We can go back into history, all the way back to 500 years, you know, to the year 500, and pick up a story there that’s the same story that we’re hearing today.
-
Now, what do you think about Trump moving troops into all these cities, and talking about the death penalty in D.C. for any kind of capital crime, and selling off the city buildings, and…
-
I mean, is this martial law by baby-stepping? What do you think’s going on?
-
It may be, Jack. The only alternative explanation I have heard
-
is that Trump wants to have
-
troops in Democratic cities so that they will suppress
-
rioting when Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and others are arrested.
-
Yes, I heard you say that. And of course, my response to that is that’s physically impossible. Now, that’s not saying they won’t dress up people and look like them. In fact, we don’t even know that anybody that is anybody today is the same person they were
-
A few years ago. I mean, I used to think that was kind of far-fetched, and now I know that everything is… I mean…
-
It’s all an actor’s paradise. You know, Jim Carrey playing Joe Biden on one day, and then somebody much taller than him playing Joe Biden on another, and Americans never catching on that they’re seeing distinctly.
-
This guy was 4 inches taller than Biden. I mean, it was absurd!
-
Yep.
-
And then we have this story here, which is very disturbing to me, and I think that there’s some reason… well, there’s not some reason. I know that one of the chief things that Trump’s employed to do here is to destroy the First Amendment, and…
-
This is just another example of how that’s gonna be done. And, you know, we’re gonna… we’re gonna crack down on flag burning.
-
flag burning is totally legitimate, it’s utterly constitutional, and there’s freshness of contempt. There’s a difference between burning a symbol of the country and burning the country.
-
Absolutely. This is just….
-
This is ridiculous!
-
It’s an expression of speech, it’s just the acting out Of a speech.
-
This case study, I mean, the Constitution, the case law is very clear about this.
-
Right. And so, you know, it seems like Trump doesn’t really care too much about case law as he tries to fire all the judges and so forth, and you know there’s been parts of me at various times that thought, you know, a lot of these judges gotta go, because they’re all…
-
they work in the other direction. They, you know, they handle your case and overlook the fact that it’s all fraud, but on the… the bottom line is that there’s no law left in the United States.
-
Back in my motion, I actually laid out… I declared the judge was in collusion with the Posner attorneys, and it was a conspiracy to deprive me of my constitutional rights under color of law.
-
That’s exactly what it was, absolutely. And so, here we have, you know, it’s a statement of contempt towards our nation, enacted used by groups of foreign nationalists to calculate, intimidate, and threaten violence against Americans.
-
And this is just another step you get before you say that’s a hate crime. And then the hate crime leads you to the death penalty, or anti-Semitism, and…
-
And so, what we have is we have Trump compartmentalizing free speech, okay? So you have free speech over here, we spoke about it before. That’s called anti-Semitism, so that’s no longer free speech. You can speak, but not that. And then we have flag burning, or even maybe you talking about burning the flag, that’s hate speech, so that’s not free speech anymore.
-
So we just have this little area over here that you’re allowed to speak freely about. You could talk about your cat, your dog, or whatever you said on Facebook that wasn’t
-
you know, hate speech. And it just seems to me that Trump’s very, very, very active against the First Amendment. And…
-
I don’t know if you would agree with that.
-
hell isn’t putting America first, that’s for goddamn sure, Jack.
-
Right. So….
-
This guy was such a con man, a Pied Piper, led us down a path.
-
He basically would like to convert America into a Jewish state!
-
Yes.
-
I’m convinced it’s that bad.
-
Then he… then he decides he’s going to take a position in Intel.
-
you know, which is… I mean, it’s not an American economic system, it’s not any part of our political history.
-
that the government buys and operates corporations, much like a quartocracy, you know, some sort of version of Mussolini’s government. I mean, it’s definitely fascism.
-
But it’s just the next baby step, alright? So you’ve got people like Rand Paul saying it’s a terrible idea. Well, Rand Paul, that’s one of the weakest statements you could ever come up with. I mean, it’s not just a….
-
Yeah.
-
a bad idea. It removes the separation of our government from our private enterprise system and private property. So, in the future, then, what do we make… what does government make decisions on? What’s best for the people, or best for their financial interests?
-
And Trump’s saying that he’s not done. He might take positions in other companies.
-
And so, before long, we just have a corporate state that’s another, you know, what do they call those companies? A shell company, maintaining other corporations.
-
and functioning as a big box company, the same as Amazon or anyone else with their own interests.
-
And, their own fake people that, you know, corporations become people, and not a government for any of the people that are supposedly under their care. So, these are just alarming steps, and they all represent little steps that, if you just keep watching them move two years from now, they’re going to be gigantic things.
-
The whole landscape of the United States is going to be different when the federal government is involved with owning all the companies. We already have the Federal Reserve and BlackRock
-
owning everything. We already have them… I saw an article in Ed Griffin’s paper about how BlackRock takes a community, buys all the… buys all the houses out of it.
-
They showed a picture of, like, one of these little communities where there was relatively new homes. They were all priced around $300,000, that’s how they were marketed when the people lived in them. BlackRock buys the whole shoot match.
-
then their plan is they’ll keep it off the market for a period of months, and then they’ll begin to sell some of the units in that housing development to their own companies who buy them at, like, two and a half, three times their pre-marketed price, which they were sold at, so they’ll sell them for $700,000.
-
Then they’ll take those prices and say, okay, this is now the new market, you know, there’s a word for that, but you can have your community evaluated by, just by sales, you know, the real estate,
-
Valuation, new assessed valuation.
-
Exactly, and so suddenly we have…
-
BlackRock… BlackRock owning everything in a community that used to be, and no one can afford to live there. I mean, it’s impossible for people to buy the home, and…
-
And on the other hand, we have meta going into the states like, I think it was Louisiana.
-
Or it could have been Mississippi, but one of those two right there, low-income states, buying up enormous, enormous large blocks of their property, of course, to put these data centers on. And,
-
and then take everybody’s property, and now there’s arguments for why the electricity bills are going up all over the country, because these things are starting to take their toll on it, so that they can create more AI and more Peter Thiels, the reptile, you know, Palantir, etc, to monitor and control our lives. I mean, it’s just amazing, it’s just out of control.
-
And how can even the average person that… that’s now being told that soccer, you know, they’re talking about soccer as the new, …
-
American sport. Boston’s gonna put in a soccer facility, something to do with Trump. Trump’s up there with a big check for the new soccer. What is this about? I mean, it’s new, I just ran into it today, but…
-
what does it mean when they’re pushing people away from, you know, football and the typical American sports, moving them into European-type sports? And …
-
I don’t know. I just think there’s a whole lot going on here that I don’t like, and I don’t see any way out of it, other than people getting kinetic and fiercely,
-
fiercely upset about it. I mean, they can do some things. You know, people can make Trump… the Trump administration back down on forcing people to, sign up some certification for Israel in order to get
-
payments for emergency damage done, you know, … you know, FEMA’s gonna come fix your area, you have to agree as a community that you’re not gonna boycott Israel. Well, they got… they had to back down from that.
-
And that’s because there was an outcry. Wasn’t that loud. Nobody was in the streets, but there was enough of an outcry that they said, okay, we’re not going to do this right now. We’ll do that next week.
-
And… if the people would get off their ass.
-
you know, maybe some things can change. I mean, maybe people could go into these communities and say, well, Meta, we’re gonna tear your stuff down. You’re not building it here.
-
we don’t care if you call it your private property, you imagine that we have… all of our electricity goes to you, all of our water goes to you, that you have some importance here greater than the importance of the human beings that live here. That’s what they imagine. And then they’re going to use the law to support that. Well, there comes a time when the law won’t
-
Help the average person anymore, and they have to take the law in their own hands.
-
That’s what I have to say about it.
-
Well, you’ve said it very well, Jack, as you do.
-
It’s a hell of a fix we’re in!
-
Yep.
-
Everything’s falling apart. It’s unreal.
-
… We’ve got governors like that, Governor Hosam, or whatever her name is, pardoning illegal… pardon killers.
-
you know, so that they don’t get deported. I mean, these people aren’t American. That’s not American behavior. We have a judge out in… is in Utah.
-
not Utah, but Las Vegas,
-
Nevada, you know, has an Israeli official, an associate of Netanyahu, who’s trying to rape a child who’s also,
-
Got some sort of, you know, affliction such that they’re handicapped.
-
And then they fly them back home to Israel.
-
Donald Trump interviewing personally in that case at the behest of Bibi Netanyahu.
-
Yep.
-
Who the hell is this guy?
-
That’s an action making Israel first, not America. It’s disgusting, it’s disgraceful, I can’t believe he did it. I damn him for it.
-
It’s not… I mean, you and I both know we don’t have words to say how bad it really is. I mean, it means that the United States is gone. We don’t have a country, we have… we have an occupation force, we’re… we’re just, Israel East or West, or whatever direction we are, west.
-
And Netanyahu is basically Satan king.
-
And the rest of the people bow to Him. And even with all this, I think the national standing is that polls are at 43% of people think that the genocide in Israel is a genocide. They’re finally coming to understand that.
-
It doesn’t make any difference. I mean, Israel keeps pounding the same sand up everybody’s ass. YouTube has… blocks out part of their, you know, when you first bring up YouTube, you get little video choices there.
-
And they always have something up in the top left, the first one, it’s some positive thing about Israel, either some made-up story about their past, or how they interact with the community, and bring goodness, and how God’s light shines through them, and oh my god, it’s just nonsense.
-
And it just goes on and on and on. All of our… all of our media is controlled by these people. All of the PSYOPs are run by them. And we have a never-ending PSYOP. Another PSYOP is that Israel is God’s chosen people, and that they… they’re doing any kind of good at all, when they’ve been the bane of humanity for 2,000 years or more.
-
Alright.
-
100% right. 100%.
-
100%.
-
I guess it’s time we get some rest. What do you, anything else you want to talk about?
-
We’re good, we’re good, we’re good.
-
Alright, we’re with you.
-
But now they’re in there.
-
All things reconsidered community, and … Anticipate.
-
Victor will be making another of his attack videos out of parts of what we have to say, and doing his best to distort them, Jack, but I think we’re… we’re doing what we can to get the truth out to the American people, in spite of it all.
-
Yep, we can go to our resting place knowing that we gave it a shot. You know, we didn’t stand there and do nothing.
-
But we could.
-
Yep, that’s right. And we love you for it.
-
Marshall added with what we had.
-
what we had, right. Yeah, because we don’t have their resources, and they have an infinite amount of resources. The game is stacked against us as though it were scripted. We’re supposed to climb out of this hole on our own, with all things against us, against all odds.
-
But, Jim, I love you for what you do, and I know you’re a brave man. I know it’s gotta give you pause once in a while, thinking, what the hell am I getting my… you know, I could be dead tomorrow. They just show up, blow me away and away, you know, and then.
-
I just take it one day at a time. Love you, Stephanie, and I’m so grateful to everyone out there who’s supporting our efforts.
-
Very good. Alright, we’ll see you nex