https://www.givesendgo.com/jamesfetzer
GiveSendGo : The Life Story of James Fetzer
TRANSCRIPT
-
Hey, everyone, and welcome again to another edition of AllThingsReconsidered.tv. Myself, Jack Mullen, and Dr. James Fetzer.
-
We’ve been busy this week, and I did have some material sent out to you, but Dr. Fetzer was out of town.
-
and he’s got quite a story to tell. We have lots of good things to speak about tonight, Jim. There’s so much going on updated news on the Ndaa and the Section 219. We’ll get to that. We got to talk about Mitch Mcconnell and Lindsey Graham, and oh, so many other things going on.
-
In the meantime, welcome to the show, and alright, so tell us where you were this week and how it went.
-
Well, I flew out to Las Vegas Tuesday, Jet, which is why I missed the show with you.
-
And was there until Saturday.
-
And I was, in part, it was to be at Freedom Fest, which is this libertarian conference held at Caesar’s Forum. It’s a huge layout.
-
The temperature was unreal.
-
It was like 107, 108, 109, me got to 110. Staying at the Flamingo.
-
with Casey Whalen, who’s a videographer. Now, he was doing work for Sam Bushman and Zach, recording, like, 40 or more interviews, and the very first he did was with me. And from our room on the 24th floor of the Flamingo, you could see the giant
-
Ferris wheel and right behind it there’s this fear that 24/7 is showing images rotating.
-
mood, but all kinds of spectacular stuff. I mean, it was a very clear view right from our room on the 24th floor.
-
So, we had a number of really, good meals together. There was a rib place there. There’s a thing called the Link, L-I-N-Q, roughly between the Flamingo and where Caesar’s Forum was held, and the…
-
The Ferris wheel and all that.
-
One being a rib place where we had a wonderful, wonderful meal. But the whole thing really was super. They introduced me to Sheriff Mack right off the bat. I mean, you know.
-
I hadn’t been there 30 minutes when I’d already met Sheriff Mack. And then shortly thereafter, Sam and I did the interview. It’s about 27 minutes.
-
Probably one of the best short interviews I’ve ever done, Jack. I mean, he said to me before, you want to keep my answers concise because you want to cover a lot of territory, and I was glad to comply. He’s got 30 years of experience as a radio host.
-
Yeah, remarkably, Jack, the man is blind. He’s blind.
-
But he’s done all this really, really wonderful stuff and he had enough conversation with me to size me up already. I mean the guy’s very perceptive.
-
And we just had a Cracker Jack interview. I’m real tickled about it. And then Casey.
-
Of course, as you know, I was working on a documentary about yours truly, and we got 3 hours of interviews in the can.
-
And I think interspersed with, you know, some episodes of my past, I think it’s going to be very successful. Casey, too, impressed me that he seemed to understand what I was all about. If you went to GiveSendGo.com,
-
slash James Fetzer, for example, you can read Casey’s take on
-
the documentary, and anyone who just feels, I suppose, you know, could toss a few bucks in the bucket to support it, but in any case, it’s going very, very well. I haven’t asked Casey specifically, but I think within four to six months, it’s gonna be out and about.
-
Excellent. So that event out there was a $600 a plate deal.
-
And, and you were involved with it. Did you get a chance to see any of the shows?
-
Well, I sat in on one about economics, you know, and about how to plan for the future and all that. There were any number of those fora. There were hundreds of tables set up in this gigantic spread. I mean, hundreds.
-
Most of the time I just spent,
-
hanging around Casey and Sam and doing their thing and going back and forth to the hotel. Little personal stuff. I picked up some presents for my grandkids, for example, but it was just thoroughly enjoyable, Jack, thoroughly enjoyable.
-
There’s quite a, quite a collection of people there. It looks to me like maybe 50 or 70 some speakers. I mean, there’s quite a few of them there.
-
Yeah, yeah, it was stunning, stunning.
-
Hmm.
-
I didn’t sit for any $600 plate meals, I guarantee you, but.
-
Well, that’s what the tickets cost to be, part of the fre.
-
Well, they comped me in. They comped me in because I was, you know, sort of.
-
Special guest, whatever.
-
Yeah, well, that’s pretty nice. So you spoke to Sheriff Mack. What’d you talk about?
-
Only briefly about his coming. He’s up for coming on my show. You know, Sam had wanted to introduce me. I had no idea, or I should have known. I guess you must have mentioned to me that you knew Mac, but I didn’t think of putting two and two together. But he’s.
-
website.
-
But he’s up for coming on my show on The Raw Deal where I feature guests a second hour.
-
Yeah, that’s great. Yeah, I liked him. He’s much younger than I thought.
-
Obviously, in great health. I mean, he’s about, I don’t know, maybe 6’2″, but very, very athletic, and
-
I got a favorable impression. Sam and I were talking about what kind of admin. See, I was promoting the idea of a Massey-Marjorie ticket for the Libertarians, because they’re qualified in all 50 states.
-
It’s almost impossible to put together a new political party, but you got one in place. If they only pick up and run with Massey and Marjorie, I think they could actually win this thing, because everyone’s just disillusioned with the Democrats on the one hand, the Republicans on the other.
-
They want a party that really will represent America first with a little truth and justice thrown in, and I think they would represent that ticket.
-
And we were kicking around ideas. You could have Colonel McGregor as Secretary of Defense. You could have Judge Napolitano, Attorney General, Sheriff Mayak, FBI, stuff like that. I mean, you could really have an unbelievably good
-
Administration, if they follow up now, Mark Susskind.
-
Who’s a bigwig in the Libertarian Party.
-
And I had contact in advance, because I was volunteering to back up speakers. See, I figured if…
-
if they lost any, you got a huge sprawling thing that I could volunteer to be a backup on JFK or 9-11, but, you know, when I look more closely.
-
An awful lot of those time slots were really kind of tiny, you know, 15. I’m just still taking a deep breath, my first deep breath after 15 minutes, you know.
-
Yeah. I didn’t.
-
I did prepare a little mini on JFK and how.
-
They had faked the body at the autopsy at Bethesda. That’s not the body of JFK. How Lee was in the doorway of the book depository when the motorcade passed by. How the backyard photographs had a body double.
-
My name turns out to be Roscoe White, who was CIA, got a position as a Dallas cop just before the assassination, who may have killed as many as 50 witnesses. So, you know, I had an interesting little 15-minute thing that I just put together for the occasion, but…
-
I wasn’t called upon to fill in, and it probably would have been a little out of tune with most of what they were doing. Anyhow, I wanted to, and I did write him and tell him how emphatic I was. I thought the libertarians had an opportunity here to do something historic.
-
if they run with Massey and Marjorie. We also kicked around about Tucker, because Tucker’s so enormously popular. That was actually Sam’s initial. He was thinking Massey and Tucker. And I was explaining, Tucker’s a little wet behind the ears. He still believes in Butler. For all I know, he thinks Sandy Hook was real.
-
Marjorie, and he doesn’t know how to deal with the bureaucrats and the corruption of government, which Marjorie and Massey know it inside out, see? So you can’t pull the wool over their eyes. But, you know, Tucker might have a place in the admin director, communication press secretary, who knows?
-
Others think Tucker is so good as a valuable independent voice, you don’t actually want him inside the administrator, you want him out there doing his thing, critiquing what’s going on, and that’s probably right.
-
Agreed.
-
No doubt that Massey and
-
Marjorie would be a much stronger team, although I do have a video from Tucker here, he’s coming around, but I don’t know why, you know, and I don’t know how we could save this government no matter what, since it’s a, you know, it’s a corporate entity.
-
And, so as soon as Massey and Marjorie got in the office, they would have to be explained the ground rules.
-
It’s just a really, really bad time in American history. But it was interesting that you got a chance to speak to Sam and Sheriff Mack. I manage their websites and I do a webinar with Sheriff Mack every week.
-
And, I.
-
I didn’t know that, Jack. No shit, man. I said, it would be great for me to drop that bomb.
-
Yeah, so you could have had a conversation point there, Jim, and you missed it.
-
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
-
Yeah, but anyway, that’s all right. So.
-
What are any other highlights from that trip you want to bring up before we move on?
-
Those were the primaries. I mean, getting so much of the documentary.
-
on record was really important, and I’ve sent him some suggestions for little clips from the past, you know, incidents that are worthy of
-
Inclusion as this moves forward, so…
-
Where did you, where did you record this stuff? Outside, inside, in the room?
-
Oh, it was in our hotel room.
-
I see. I had visions of you walking around, you know, talking, going down the street.
-
110 degree heat, Jackie.
-
Yeah, yeah.
-
outside was like a blast furnace. It was really terrible. I heard one rumor it was up to 117. I don’t happen to buy that, but it was very, very hot.
-
Yeah, give me…
-
You know, walking around, thank goodness, if you walked at the right entrance.
-
of the Flamingo, you were almost in the links immediately, and you got right down to the Ferris wheel in the Forum. We went up the wrong way one occasion, and had to go all the way around, and that was rather…
-
Draining, I’ll just tell you, man. Big, big difference.
-
I can imagine that humility went too high, though.
-
It was, it was, it was hot. It was hot.
-
Can you imagine the electricity bill for just air conditioning out there? My God, it’s incredible.
-
Right, you’re right. It’s true, it’s true. But I had a great time and made some new friends and just enjoyed being there and getting these things done and, you know, being a part of it.
-
But I was real tickled with the interview, especially, which I’ve already shown on several shows, and of course shared with you, my friend.
-
yeah.
-
You share with me video?
-
Yeah, the interview is Sam.
-
Oh, that one, yes, yeah, yeah, yeah, we’ve already sent that out to the folks on the list here. Yeah, that was a great interview, and sam’s a good interviewer, and also Sam is,
-
considerably different than Sheriff Mack when it comes to talking about Trump, etc. You know, he’s not a Trump supporter by any means, and I think you did a nice job of pushing forward those points. You know, you started out talking about how you voted for Trump, and then became disillusioned, and then ultimately betrayed.
-
Yes, yes, yes, 100%.
-
Yeah, so I think that’s where we all are right now. We’re in a state of, well, a lot of people are in a state of denial, but the rest of us realize that, whoever voted for Trump got betrayed. So, all right, well, let’s talk about some of the other goodies that, have come up over the last couple of days.
-
Yeah, because I’ve been playing catch up, you know, with shows yesterday and not today. I mean, now I’m so.
-
Happy to have Monday, Wednesday.
-
Friday for my Revolution Radio and RBN shows and
-
Actually, it gives me a break, and I’ll do Jack. I had just been emancipating. When you do this 5 days a week, you know, I got to prepare 30 stories for each of these days.
-
You know, it’s five days a week. It’s unrelenting. Now I actually get a little break. I can take a deep breath. I can actually relax and enjoy life.
-
It’s kind of nice, I’ll just say. I appreciate it. I think, I think RBN made the change because they needed a little more money to flow in, and they had somebody for Tuesday, Thursday they thought could
-
Bringing some box, so I’m I’m happy for them.
-
Well, and you need more time. I mean, you can’t spend every waking moment doing the same thing, so I’m happy that you got some time as well, and it’ll make you healthier.
-
Yeah, I’m feeling good.
-
So, I just saw this one, it doesn’t have the time released here, but when I picked it up, it said,
-
This is 3.40 PM.
-
today. It said one hour earlier. The U.S. Senate has rejected advancing the NDAA.
-
Really?
-
Yeah, but this is just a temporary stop.
-
Yeah, but Jack still, that’s a positive sign.
-
It’s a good sign.
-
Because that has that Section 219 that gives Israel access. You know, I think it was Ron Paul, actually, who observed, instead of getting $2 billion a year from the U.S, they’re going to have access to $1.5 trillion. $1.5 trillion! Yep. What a… what a calamity!
-
Well, this guy actually thinks that the GOP should be nuking the filibuster so the Save America Act and everything we want can be rammed through with a simple majority of this. This is like ridiculous, but.
-
the the point being, though, that it did get rejected so far. I’ve got some other supporting information here.
-
I’m extremely pleased to hear this, Jack. It’s news to me. I’m glad.
-
Yeah, me too.
-
No, that ain’t it. Where is it someplace? I had a video on it. I’ll have to go back and look for it.
-
But the problem is that they want to attach that save bill.
-
Here we go.
-
So, this particular person
-
It’s talking about 219. The Secretary of Defense shall designate an executive agent. We’ve seen this stuff before responsible for synchronizing cooperative efforts between the Us. Israel, expand, accelerate bilateral defense, technology, research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation.
-
This is, like this person says, this is really, you know, not a shared partnership of any kind, it’s a merger.
-
Of the 2 militaries together and
-
Kuchenic, is that how you say his last name?
-
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
-
He had a… he has a really nice,
-
piece here about what this really means.
-
Yes.
-
We want to talk about it right now because there’s still a couple more hours before this thing, you know, it gets passed by the Senate.
-
And,
-
Yeah. So anyway, Congressman Dennis Kuczynik, the U.S.-Israeli Defense Tech Initiative, you could almost say this is a takeover.
-
And according to Benjamin Netanyahu, he made the comment that, you know, this was his bill. The way it is written, it puts the Department of Defense in the driver’s seat over the federal departments, including state, and it runs through the whole government. And so here’s a… let’s just listen to what he has to say about this for a couple minutes.
-
Sure.
-
No, the Prime Minister of Israel has taken credit.
-
for the legislation that was put into the National Defense Authorization Act of 2027. He basically said, yeah, this is what I want. Well, he wants it because he don’t have the ability to direct the U.S. military. I mean, it’s mind-boggling when you think about it.
-
And this particular proposal, by the way, the way it’s structured… and, you know, when I first heard about it, I said, I have to read the legislation, because let me tell you, folks who are watching.
-
you have to read the legislation in order to understand its workings. And the way this is written, it puts the Department of Defense in the driver’s seat over other federal departments, including state.
-
And then this policy has, it runs through the whole government.
-
I mean, this really… you could almost say this is a takeover, and, you know, for some it’ll sound hysterical, but the truth is that it is laying the groundwork
-
for an entanglement that has never happened in the history of the United States. This is totally unprecedented.
-
Benjamin? So, you know, it comes back to the question of
-
of, you know, how does this even fit into the Constitution, the idea of the Constitution of the United States? Now.
-
I have. I had written an article here earlier about this particular thing, and there’s a lot of good stuff in here, but
-
the important thing is that, you know, is this thing constitutional? And constitutional scholars and… Former law.
-
I’m sure it is not. I’m sure it is not constitutional, Jack. The fact is that it’s been allowed to go forward, and the problem is it could take years to unravel the constitutional issues, you know, to get it to the Supreme Court.
-
So it’s all bad that it’s even in there at all. It’s just gross and untoward. I want this on my blog, Jack, by the way. I want this on my blog. Your piece here.
-
Okay, this, this, the thing about it is that we got, you know, this section, Article 2, Section 2, that provides that the President is in charge of U.S. military planning, intelligent sharing, technology, everything.
-
And at the same time, we’re being told that
-
The integration creates pressure towards shared decision making and shared consequences, thereby encroaching on the president’s exclusive constitutional role.
-
provision delegates substantial authority to executive agent who can overrule other DOD components, raising concerns about the delegation of legislative power and the principle of powers, and so on and so forth. Now, even discussing this is ridiculous, because this is all this is, okay? This is absolutely
-
the, the biggest step, and maybe the last step that Israel will have to take
-
In order to gain absolute total control over the United States, and then that includes total control over their, I say their, our surveillance systems, and through the surveillance systems, police the new policies that will be coming through with a new piece of legislation we’ll talk about in a minute.
-
That will work to, punish anti-Semitism. And, and so…
-
It is a very, very dark day in the United States, and
-
you know, I don’t know how many people understand what this really means, but I’m trying to find the section here where it talks about Benjamin not… yeah, so the evidence suggests the provision was actively championed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, called the original section 224, which is now 219,
-
My plan.
-
And, it’s also backed by APAC, of course, and
-
It’s just, you know, it’s 100%.
-
A complete and entire takeover of the most important apparatus in the United States. Everything has to do with our technology. I mean, the rest of the United States is just fluff like anywhere else.
-
But it’s the technology that gives them power, and that’s what Israel is attempting to insert itself in. First, they inserted themselves into the blood vein of our financial system and sucked it out like it was a second aorta going directly to their heart.
-
And now they’ve, taken another tentacle, so you can imagine this multi-tentacled thing attaching itself to the United States.
-
And that’s exactly what we have in this situation. And I think it’s just utterly disgusting and something that’s
-
everyone should be worried about, and you still have some time to write to whoever you think it matters. I mean, I’ve written… I sent you a copy of the letter I wrote.
-
I just called Ron Johnson today. I mean, just a few hours ago to.
-
Be emphatic about denying this. You know, I’m with you 100%, Jack.
-
Yep.
-
So anything that anyone can do should do because we’re walking in the final days of what was the United States. And when it does change, it’s going to change radically. So to keep talking about that same concept.
-
Going back to my browser here.
-
I have an article here that I put up from the I put up on the government rag.
-
Called… Congress moves to
-
criminalize criticizing Israel. Now, this article is written by Chuck Baldwin, but the important part of this article is just the details, and so we’ll have a quick look at it.
-
I think the guy’s quite brilliant. I’m very impressed with Jack Baldwin.
-
Yep, he’s a good man. I’ve done numerous interviews with him.
-
Very, very clear and direct.
-
Yeah, okay.
-
anyway…
-
He, of course, quotes Voltaire here, and we all have. We’re not certain Voltaire actually said that, but I agree. Our federal government, especially under Trump, is doing everything it can to suppress free speech in the US, particularly speech that is critical of Israel. Under Trump, public colleges and universities are under duress and threat of federal sanction if they allow public criticism of Israel by professors, teachers, anybody, students, especially for foreign students here.
-
legally are threatened with expulsion if they criticize Israel, even on social media.
-
You got to give it to MAGA. They love totalitarianism. And of course, the MAGA tards, you know, are still out there forming masses and going to MAGA meetings and telling everybody the only thing they watch is Fox News.
-
Now, however, it’s Congress, the United States, that’s in the process of attempting to pass a bill that would criminalize criticizing the Zionist state.
-
In May and June, a bipartisan coalition of 15 House Republicans, 14 Democrats, sponsored the Jewish American Security Act. Of course, it’s gotta be security.
-
A piece of legislation that if passed would constitute one of the most sweeping attacks on the First Amendment in American history. The bill enjoys practically universal backing from Jewish nonprofits and Zionist activist groups and
-
You could just well say all the money in the universe.
-
The new law presents four major demands. The appointment of specialized antisemitism commissar to manage the Department of Education. Now, a commissar to manage the Department of Education. Education is supposed to be a free investment of your mind into freely available knowledge.
-
And they’ve got a campaign combating pro-Palestine activism on campuses, $1 billion cash injection to secure Zionist nonprofits and Jewish houses of worship, mandatory state monitoring of online social media platforms in order to force them to censor anti-Semitic political speech on their platforms, and officially reoriented the mission of the FBI.
-
which is actually an agency of the International Monetary Fund and not the United States, the Department of Homeland Security and National Counterintelligence and Security Center as instruments for targeting critics of Jews in Israel and foreign enemy actors and domestic terrorists. Of course, I’ll lump those all together.
-
Obviously, you’re a domestic terrorist if you would criticize Jews. This would represent a militarization of American Jewish life, which
-
Contrary to claims from Jewish grievance groups, is no more susceptible to bias or violence interference than Christian worship. In 2025, 24 people were killed in homicidal attacks against Christians across the nations to practically no media fanfare, including a massacre at a Mormon church in Michigan and a shooting of several Catholic children.
-
in Minnesota. Most concerning is JASA’s requirement that online social media companies provide mandatory reports every six months to Congress on anti-Semitism
-
Tism and any, Israeli opinions being shared on their platforms online are outlined their strategies for content removal, for content removal and suppression, as well as coordinate the federal law enforcement in real time.
-
I mean, real time, to combat what the bill’s authors judge as extremist.
-
Anti-Semitic calls.
-
The thing about this, this is Jewish supremacism, and this is a way in which they can stop people from talking about the fact that their country is being wiped out.
-
that they’re about to go under the guillotine, and we’re going to get to that in just a few seconds. Such a law of past will treat future… will treat figures like Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Tom Massey and the list of these, as well as many other critics that have risen in recent years as terrorists and enemy of the state.
-
So this is something that is.
-
I mean, this is just unbelievable. I was watching one of the guys I had been watching for years, Richie from Boston. You may be familiar with him.
-
And one of the things he said today is that he no longer wants to live here. And then, in clarifying what he had to say, he said, it’s time for me to go home. The guy’s only, like, 52, 55 years old, somewhere in there.
-
But, you know, he’s had enough, and that means he’s ready to
-
to die. And, you know, this is… this is the final days. This is what they’ve been promoting through their fake prophecy, religious nonsense. So I wrote this article, Jim, Freedom or Domination, You Will Not Be Offered an Alternative Noahide Convention in November. And,
-
I think this is what, you know, this is part of the whole thing. Israel has the world under its thumb.
-
Under its boot, however you want to look at it.
-
Any real essence of any leadership that may have one time tried to oppose this criminal political organization known as the Capital Letters United States is long gone.
-
And now they’re going to begin the really dirty work. They’re going to create this first International Congress.
-
And it’ll be political manipulators working to help Zionists and Jewish supremacists create a plan for weaponized fictional religious world control system.
-
They hope to bring Christians and other non-Jews into a religion, forcing them into servitude as low-class citizens, including rights and privileges that would contradict, contractually allow them to exist in what Jews believe is a world controlled entirely from Jerusalem under a theocratic caste system.
-
This result would be a non-compliance, which will include punishments, including beheading. And so if we look at this as a theocratic caste system, you can see that the differences between theocracy and caste system are just a matter of semantics.
-
We have authority, divine or religious, hierarchical social groups for the caste system, governance, laws influenced by religious beliefs, or fixed roles based on birth.
-
And blah blah blah blah. Social mobility is limited by religious doctrine versus restricted by caste boundaries, and law formation is derived from sacred texts. Oh my god, they’re sacred, alright. And based on traditional practices for the caste system.
-
So, there’s very little difference between a caste system
-
and the coming, theocracy caste system. Anyway, this is a good article, I think, and it explains how this is a,
-
a storm now brewing that will soon move from Israel after the November meeting. This is funded and supported by Chabot Lubavitch, the most radical and violent, and
-
and anti-non-Jew organization within the sects of the Jewish organizations or sects.
-
on.
-
Anyway, you’re going to be given a choice to submit to the seven laws of Noahide laws, or you’re going to find yourself charged with idolry and blasphemy.
-
Yeah, the very first denying, you know, worship of idols punishable by death denies Christianity, because we got Christ on the crucifix, you know? I mean, it’s…
-
It is monstrous, Jack, what you’re talking about here, and it’s very naive not to take it seriously. I’d like to think, you know, you could defang it by pointing out that the anti…
-
And I, Semitism…
-
laws protect Palestinians because they really are Semites, whereas the Israelis are not. So there is no reason why these laws should actually be thought to protect Israelis unless they can prove they’re Semites, which is impossible for them to do. I think that might become an important issue from a legal point of view.
-
Absolutely agreed. So you’re right. And and so where do these so-called Noahide laws come from?
-
Well, don’t waste your time searching through the scriptures for a chapter and verse that lists these seven laws. These are, in fact, fictional. The assertions that these laws were given to Adam and then to Noah is a fabrication of post-Christian rabbinic tradition.
-
It’s a rabbinic invention. They’re not derived from a clear divine commandment in the Torah, but through esoteric and often convoluted Talmudic exergis… ex… genesis. I can’t say the word, but I can write it. Anyway, the thing about…
-
The thing about this is that the Talmud and the other doctrines that they refer to are just a collection of tradition and history that have been written down. They’re simply things that people said.
-
And this is one of the ideas that they came up with. There’s no such thing as a Noahide law, and there never was.
-
Anyway, people can read through this. I want to get to the part that the problem is that
-
The act of worshiping Jesus Christ is a capital offense.
-
Yep.
-
And the capital offense has no other possible outcome except beheading.
-
Right, there’s only one penalty for this capital offense.
-
The Talmud discusses the penalties for transgression and for the gravest offenses, particularly idolatry and blasphemy. Blasphemy would come under being anti-Semitic.
-
The punishment is death. More specifically, law mandates execution by decapitation.
-
And,
-
Sources drawing directly from rabbinical texts confirm this horrifying reality. One source says bluntly, the punishment for non-Jews violating the high law is in no uncertain terms execution by decapitation in almost all cases.
-
Another says, under the Noahide laws, all Christians will be decapitated.
-
So…
-
I, I think that people need to get off their behinds and I’m most happy with the final word that I made here. And I, I’m sorry to take up this time, but this is important because.
-
Oh no, this is so important. By the way, Christian Zionists need to get a grip and recognize the reality here. It’s very grim.
-
It is they’re not going to know until they bring the the.
-
Irritating how to roll them in.
-
Yep. Anyway, and I made the point that I put the biblical and Talmudic references in here, not because they mean anything to me, but because it’s the foundation in which this plan has been laid. The plan has evolved over a thousand years, was refined in the late 1800s, you know, finding itself in the
-
in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, for example, it is the reason the United States of America was undermined and turned into an instrument of world demolition and a tool in service of this modern crusade to truly enslave the world.
-
It’s the reason my father, my sons have never been given even a glimpse of life as the Founding Fathers envisioned, life under natural law enforced through common law, life not as a corporate vassal living in a bankrupt nation under disguised admiralty law and in the cage of the 14th Amendment. I don’t take any of this material as spiritual. Religion is not spiritual. In fact, the definition of religion is about
-
how you bind something to something else. And I’ve written something about how that’s about mind control.
-
But rather than cobbling together of ancient information reformulated into a perfect mind control appliance that gives color of spiritualism to a pure evil plan with domination control, and if worked out, perpetual slavery, it’s time for people to drop the adult fantasy of three invented religions and stop playing along like it’s real.
-
As though it really happened. It did not, and it cannot. Like children waiting for Santa Claus, people are now gathering in their preferred fantasy tribe, preparing for the end that will not be at all what they expected. Santa Claus is not real either. Soon you will have to decide whether you accept the collective delusion or the truth.
-
Only your intuition could be your guide, and if you relied on that, and none of the political, spiritual, or authorities offered to you to lead you astray, you might just find truth waiting there, and it’s always been there, right in front of your eyes. So I… you know, this is the thing. I mean, it’s time to stop playing games like all that 2,000-year-old
-
rehash stuff that was created by by the infancy of the Catholic Church, and somewhere around 300 AD. Beginning with the formulation of the idea after 135 AD.
-
Or they just cobbled together these old pieces from much greater documents from the past, even 15, 2000 years before, and then put it into this story.
-
And this story, by the way, has no validity at all from historians from the time period. If you look at all of the history from the first century A.D, there’s not one single mention of Jesus Christ, not even from Josephus, not from people who are church scholars or religious scholars of that day. Nothing ever mentioned about any of the stuff we hear in the New Testament.
-
So this was contrived by the same people that have now taken over the United States and before that were thrown out of 109 countries or 110 countries 109 times.
-
And, I don’t think there’s much time left to confront it, and do something significant, you know.
-
To make this go away. And the only way that can happen is if people do something. It doesn’t matter. If everyone does something, it’ll be a big movement.
-
Jackie, you’re the Paul Revere of international terrorism, I must say. This is wonderful. You’re calling this out. It’s totally appropriate. Not a moment too soon.
-
Thank you. I wouldn’t mind being like Paul Revere. I’m… my hero, of course, is Tom Jefferson, but I loved all those guys. I would love to go… if you could have a fantasy world, you’d go have a beer with them all, sit down at one of those old taverns. What a fun time. And they’re great men, and they’re all, heavily,
-
you know, disparaged today. You see them in movies being disparaged. You see Tom Jefferson, if you go down to Monticello, I’ve been down there recently, and many times in my life,
-
And all it is is about Tom Jefferson had some slaves. There’s nothing else there. There’s signs everywhere. Basically, remember, Tom Jefferson was a slave owner. He supposedly had a daughter with one of the slaves. I mean, it is no end to the way in which they would try to inflict harm on his memory.
-
And and the reason being is because these are the same people that told us the truth then.
-
And that’s the same people trying to silence that truth from the future. And they’re doing it now with the anti-Semitism law. There can’t be an American alive today that believes
-
in this country, with our Constitution, with the First Amendment, that allows us to say anything about anybody we want without doing harm, or without, in some way, you know, endangering their way of life through
-
What is the word? You can’t harm their image to the point of being, you know, damaging to their
-
Way of life, basically. Other than that, you say whatever you want. It doesn’t matter what I want to say, and yet be told you can’t criticize Israel, that you can’t mention that the Palestinians were just wiped off the map by Trump and company. No, no, no, no, that’s not the United States. Why are people saying no?
-
in abundance. Why aren’t… Yeah, I don’t know.
-
I guess you understand what I’m trying to say, but it makes no sense…
-
Absolutely.
-
Convention.
-
You can’t speak your mind. What does it mean to be an American, for Christ’s sake? I mean, that’s what it’s all about
-
Freedom of speech, the First Amendment, by far our most important right, and I’ll be damned if I’m gonna let some foreign nation interfere in here, and on their own behalf, for self-serving purposes, to destroy the Constitution of the United States. To hell with that!
-
I agree with you 100%.
-
So anyway, that’s.
-
That’s a couple of plugs there for the things that are coming up. And so everybody needs to do something about the Ndaa.
-
They need to write a letter, make a phone call. There’s nothing scary about it. I don’t know what people are afraid of. I put in… I put… I put letters for all this stuff on my Facebook,
-
And people are welcome to just take my letter and rewrite it, you know, put your name on it, change any part of it you like, and send it in. But it’s pretty simple. Dear Congressman, you cannot and should not and legally cannot, you know, vote on behalf of this particular bill if it includes Section 219.
-
I mean, it’s just a pretty trivial thing. And Jim, when you made a phone call today to Johnson’s office, how did that go? Tell us, tell the people how that works.
-
No, it’s just a recording, but I mean, you got that phone number, you call up, you get to the central switchboard, they ask which senator, representative, would you want to…
-
Contact and you tell them and they connect you and you have an opportunity to leave your comment, your opinion on one line. If you got a personal problem, you need the assistance of their office, another line. It’s about as simple as it could be.
-
You may even have the number there, Jack. It’s a 212 number. We can share it.
-
Yeah, okay
-
Easily accessible and anyone can call and reach out to the member of their house or representative or their senators. I think the Senate in this case is crucial.
-
I agree with you. They’re the last step in this.
-
step towards the end of the United States. And, you know, even if we could block at this time, and there’s a possibility, these people don’t stop. You know, there’s always next year, and the year after, and whatever. It comes around. There’s no end to how many times something can be reintroduced. But there is an end to people’s
-
energy, you know, and eventually they tire people out, or a new group of youngsters come up and don’t even know what the hell we’re talking about. It’s kind of the idea of the constitutional sheriff.
-
You get them all lined up together and then all of a sudden it’s election time and a third of them or half of them are voted out. A new group come in and say, you know, I’ve never even read the Constitution in my life.
-
It presents people that want to maintain liberty and freedom in their life with a big responsibility. Founding fathers wrote about that, and they said, you know, this thing is going to be
-
an ongoing problem, and if you’re not educated, if you won’t take the time to learn something, then the way it’s going to work out for you is not good. That phone number for the Capital Switchboard is 202
-
2, 2, 4… 3121. 202243121.
-
I was just…
-
Just looking it up myself. You got it exactly right.
-
Actually, Stephanie did.
-
202-224-3121. Good work, Stephanie. Excellent. Yes, yes, yes.
-
Now, here’s the thing. Most people think maybe they’re going to get, you know, the congressman’s going to pick up.
-
Chance, fat chance, fat chance.
-
Now I remember that.
-
The fact is, they do pay attention to numbers, numbers of callers, you know, on one side or another. They do. Ron Johnson claims he listens to all the calls. I doubt it very much, but I do think they make a difference.
-
I agree. And I do remember, since I’ve been doing this for a long time, a day when I would call there and I’d actually get to speak to a person, you know, and they would say, what is it you’d like to talk about? And you just do the same thing.
-
They don’t ask any questions or confront you, they just say, okay, they take notes, you know, or at least that’s what they were supposed to have done.
-
So anyway, there’s nothing frightening about this. I mean, it’s a lot more frightening, I suppose, for most people to go.
-
In front of their school board, But, anyway, alright, so…
-
Let’s get back to this. Let’s see, I want to go before I get to Tucker here to talk a little bit about Lindsey Graham and.
-
Congratulations McC.
-
and Mitch McConnell. Now, you know, when Mitch died, I figured he was an old guy, and I couldn’t wait for him to go anyway, and I didn’t pay any attention, so…
-
Bring us up to speed with what happened to Mitch, if you know, and do you think there was anything nefarious there? And why did his wife of 20 years younger or more end up in China very shortly after that? What do you think’s going on there?
-
Well, now, the last report I have was.
-
they had what I’m convinced was an AI-fabricated call from Mitch, saying he’d fallen, was rendered unconscious, but he’d be back, because they don’t want to allow
-
The governor to have the opportunity to appoint a replacement for him.
-
They want to keep the seat under control. His wife, Elaine Chao, former Secretary of Transportation, has long been suspected of being an agent of China.
-
And the idea that she, under these circumstances, should rush back to China to have a public meeting with the Vice President of China, I think is rather startling confirmation thereof, Jack. That’s my interpretation, my read.
-
So I think Mitch is brain dead. I don’t think he’s capable of conducting his office. That means there should be the appointment of a successor, but they’re playing games here to try to pretend he’s actually still competent.
-
So that won’t happen purely for political reasons. They’re very worried about Democrats taking control of the Senate, which I believe is going to happen in spite of their machinations.
-
Well, it’s interesting that you’re right. I mean, it’s just like saying Benjamin Netanyahu is still alive. There’s no way to confirm that, and at least none that I know of. He’s not going to show up at my house.
-
But, you know, my… the last I saw Mitch, he was on life support and looking pretty bad. Now, we see here he is, has finally released the proof of life video and demonstrated that he’s good to go.
-
there’s no way to know this isn’t AI now. Honey, show them you’re okay.
-
Yeah, what a joke. What a joke. I love it.
-
I told you he was okay. So anyway, obviously that’s a.
-
I love it! I love it!
-
So…
-
Bars!
-
Yeah.
-
I mean, what could she be going to China for?
-
Yeah.
-
Yeah.
-
I mean, give me a speculation.
-
Oh, I’m telling you, I think she’s actually an agent of China. She was going there to review the bidding, to explain she’s no longer in a position to manipulate the former majority leader of the Senate because he’s noncompetent. So, you know, I mean, she was giving them an update on the status of
-
her project, which is manipulating Mitch.
-
So, it was like a debriefing, you know, I’m out.
-
Yeah, yeah.
-
Yeah, yeah, okay.
-
Debriefing, right?
-
That makes complete sense.
-
And she’s Chinese Intel, I don’t have any doubt about it.
-
And, and the thing is, that’s the way they would behave. If you watch any of these old sci-fi, or not science, but the old Cold War
-
Tv series, or especially movies,
-
you know, this is exactly the way the Asians would behave. As soon as their target was gone, they would instantly have to report back and, and debrief.
-
Yeah. So…
-
Yep, yep, now.
-
Lindsay.
-
That story appears to be a concoction to this torn aorta.
-
Joaquin Agobian did a very nice job of the timeline.
-
He was last seen visiting a drone factory in Ukraine, which, while he was there, was attacked by the Russians. Now, Joaquin believes, and I do as well, that he was killed there.
-
But they didn’t want to admit it, because it would be, you know, somehow regarded as a success for Russia. So they invented this story that has him in a…
-
too-fast-to-be-possible mode of transportation. I mean, Joaquin has it all spelled out in a late article here, I think it’s in State of the Nation. 10-hour train trip, blah blah blah, flying back.
-
He was here in the U.S. before it would have been physically possible for him to be back in the U.S, so it’s a manufactured story, Jack. He appears to have been killed in a Russian strike on a drone factory in Ukraine, and it’s so embarrassing politically, they don’t want to admit it.
-
Well, I, I just saw this story today that was from the 12th and I didn’t see, Yakim’s, but, they, this guy.
-
There it is. Yeah, that’s the same. This is Joaquin’s analysis. Yes, very good.
-
It’s the same thing. There’s not enough time for him to get back here and die.
-
Right, that’s right.
-
I saw something today saying he died of something called aortic dissection, and then they came up with, yeah, yeah, that, well, I mean, if you dissect my aorta.
-
He may have died of a ruptured aorta because of the impact of Russian missiles on the factory in Ukraine, but he didn’t die here in the USA.
-
I think… I do believe he’s dead, and a lot of people are not shedding tears.
-
Right. Especially me. I mean, Lindsey Graham was problematic, and you could not possibly get rid of him. He shouldn’t have won the last election. How could he? And this, you know, homosexual buffoon, everything that was anti-American and pro-Israel, that’s all he did for a living.
-
Yeah, okay.
-
So…
-
Great.
-
Anyway, so…
-
Good riddance, right?
-
Yep. I had another little bit on him here somewhere.
-
Okay, so here’s, Marjorie’s, conversation. It’s only a minute, but it’s pretty interesting. I don’t know whether you’ve heard it or not about Lindsey, and I agree with this 100%, and it’s good riddance, Lindsey. And of course, North Carolina, I guess, will be free to appoint their own,
-
That was good.
-
and without having any election.
-
Alright, here we go. …disagreed, wholeheartedly with many of his policies.
-
He was a neocon warmonger. He was a murderer. He wanted to wipe out and kill many innocent people in Iran, in Gaza, in Lebanon. He supported war more than anything. He never wanted peace. The only time he may have been interested in peace was because this war is hurting the midterms for President Trump and Republicans.
-
However, one thing about Lindsey Graham that we can all say for sure is he was a dedicated Zionist.
-
And that’s why he worked so diligently to send as much money as possible, weapons as possible for Israel. But he may have been an elected US Senator, but he really was the greatest lobbyist that the military industrial complex could ever have holding power in Washington.
-
And his state, South Carolina, has over 400 military contractors, over 400 that Lindsey Graham made sure that got all types of contracts, grants, got all types of US tax dollars to continue their work to serve the military industrial complex.
-
So it is an interesting thing of how everyone’s being shamed and told you can’t say anything negative about Lindsey Graham. Look, we can say two things. We can say, oh, yeah, he was a delightful person to be around. But at the same time, I disagreed with him adamantly on many, many issues. And it’s okay to say both of those things.
-
Absolutely. And you can say that in the United States, and under our laws, you can say whatever the hell you want to say, as long as it’s not defamation. That was the word I was looking for a little bit ago. So, anyway…
-
Lindsey’s gone, and I think that that has to be, something bad for… for the Trump administration, and, and probably Israel as well, unless they were involved with it as a way. It was, alexander Dugan that I read today said that this was possibly…
-
That he was killed in, in, in, Ukraine, and that he was, it was a black mark sent to,
-
What did he say? It was a black mark sent to Trump to notify him that he’s got to continue to prosecute this war properly in Iran and, you know, against to destroy.
-
Iran. And he also said, you know, that he didn’t expect… and of course, they’re passing around the nonsense that Iran had something to do with it. And that’s what they would say about everything, even when they’re in an Israeli country, you know? Because that’s what Ukraine is, right?
-
Oh, yeah.
-
Stupid. Stupid.
-
He could have been killed in the Israeli consulate or something, and they would have said Iran did it.
-
Oh, okay, well, goodbye, good riddance, and let’s move on. So what else do we have here?
-
We’ve got Tucker talking about Trump and and there’s a lot to say about Trump. It’s hard to follow his corruption, I mean, and his grifting.
-
Become mind-boggling, Jack!
-
It is incredible.
-
about it. And the kids, Eric and Donald Jr, they are just as corrupt as their father. Even Barron appears to be raking in the dough. I mean, it’s just staggering.
-
Right. I can’t pull it up, but.
-
Somebody…
-
Somebody. Yeah, mull it up. I’d love to if you can find it.
-
No, I was just thinking about, Donald Jr. He just showed up at a funeral.
-
Who was it?
-
I now have nothing but contempt for the whole Trump family. Lock, stock and barrel.
-
Me too. Anyway, here’s Tucker talking about Trump, and it’s such a betrayal.
-
following Israel. So it’s like, that is the opposite of America first. That’s America in the subordinate position.
-
the female position, sorry, the bottom in this relationship, and that’s the opposite of what we thought we were getting, and what they told us we were getting. It’s like, it’s so… it’s such a betrayal that anyone attached to that is going to have a hard time
-
reestablishing trust, even if he’s a good man, and JD Vance is a good man, but I think it’s hard. It’s like, you know, you’re part of that? I mean, how could you betrayed us? And it’s the betrayal that makes it so bitter for people like me, and maybe you, who voted for Trump, and I campaigned for and with him.
-
You know, it’s like, really? We really believe that you were gonna at least try? And in the end, it’s all about cryptocurrency scams and wars for Israel? I mean, I can’t believe you did that. Hiding the Epstein stuff?
-
Yelling at anyone who asks questions about the Butler shooting? Are you kidding? I’m an adult!
-
I’m from this country.
-
Like, I own this government. I own exactly as much of the government as you do, because we’re both citizens. How dare you speak to me the way you work for me? Like, that’s how I personally feel about it. Like, I’m outraged that someone I supported
-
would do something like this, would betray the country and his own voters, and then to whip around and say, I’m not loyal. I’m not loyal. I am loyal. My whole life is marked by loyalty. I’m married to my high school girlfriend. I believe in loyalty, okay? You’re disloyal. You sold out the country to a foreign nation.
-
Hey, buddy.
-
Whoa!
-
Yay!
-
Wonderful, Jack. What a great statement.
-
Haha.
-
Tucker has truly come into his own.
-
He’s more following Israel. So it’s, yep, he has what a clear.
-
Love it. I love it.
-
Anyway, so…
-
That was wonderful. That was inspirational.
-
It does. It makes you feel good to hear stuff like that. So anyway, I knew what I was thinking about, you know, that Trump Jr. was, he shows up at the Robinson trial, you know, where they’re trying to railroad that Robinson kid for killing Charlie Kirk.
-
And so, what does it mean when he shows up there? I mean, is it like bringing in the… the heavy guard to make sure nobody slips up, and…
-
Sure, sure. Inside Trump’s on, you know.
-
Yeah, I.
-
Prosecuting guy who obviously had nothing to do with it. Charlie isn’t even dead, for Christ’s sake. How can you try a guy for killing somebody who’s still alive?
-
Yeah, okay.
-
However you look at it, you know, this uncovering is exposing the fact that whatever happened there didn’t happen any way, shape, or form.
-
the way that we were told it did, and that this entire thing has been a psyop at the best and a complete fraud scam at the worst. And, anyway, Americans deserve to know that
-
That this thing went down that way and this kid, if he’s going to actually be killed, that’s just a sad testimony to humanity. How many times in history has a patsy been set up?
-
Yeah, yeah. All the time, Jack. It’s a routine. It’s standard operating procedure.
-
And why is his family not.
-
screaming on the social media and writing comments on X.
-
They got to be being paid off, Jack. Paid off. Big bucks.
-
And they’ve been assured that he’ll be exonerated by and by that this is all theater.
-
And it is all theater.
-
And so, you know.
-
Tyler Robinson, I think that’s his name. You know, he’s, he’s supposed to sit in court and not shout out. I guess if he shouts out, he doesn’t go back in the room anymore.
-
Well.
-
But anyway, it’s, it’s, it’s just like Lee Harvey Oswald, you know, it’
-
It’s just the same old story over and over and over and over.
-
Sir Hannah, Sir Hannah.
-
Yep.
-
Or James Earl Ray, for that matter. None of them actually shot. The parties are alleged to have killed none of them.
-
Absolutely.
-
All right, so now I’m just going to pick a couple few things that I have here remaining for us to look at.
-
I like… this is one of my pet peeve topics, and
-
I think you’ll recognize it as one.
-
Python’s extreme biology may hold clues for treating human disease.
-
Now, as you know, It’s been determined that
-
Snake venom was part of the COVID vaccine.
-
Yep.
-
Especially the ones that had two shots. And
-
and we come to find out that the snake venom that was primarily used was a crate snake, which is a snake that’s only found in one little tiny part of China, and, as I pointed out before, that was foreshadowed in the blacklist in Season 4, Episode 15, where they where they had
-
whatever the hell his name was, Reddington, Reddington become
-
paralyzed, or started to become paralyzed, and was told he was going to have 4 days to live, and then they find out in the show that he had been poisoned with none other than crate snake venom. Now, all these venoms will kill you pretty quickly.
-
And it’ll cause your blood to clot and all of the symptoms that you see, and blood clotting is one of the primary ones, but many, many, like dozens of symptoms that people said they had as a result of COVID, but in fact were.
-
Oh, this daughter, actually, from the snake van.
-
Yeah, with the snake venom. So, now there’s this new thing to use venoms in all sorts of stuff, and they’re saying that, you know, this venom would be really good for
-
For, like,
-
Yes.
-
Flu shots.
-
Really good, yeah.
-
So you need to ask your doctor if snake venom is right for you because I don’t think it is.
-
I love it. Why not our Snickers cyanide?
-
But they’re going to hold many secrets that could help people live longer and better. Unfortunately.
-
What horse? What horse? Yeah.
-
If you get the shot, some of these people are going to die much faster than they thought.
-
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
-
I just want to remind everyone that.
-
Creepy, creepy.
-
They’ve got snake venom in all sorts of things now. You’ve got to look. I mean, they put it in flu vaccines. It’s in hand creams and facial creams especially, and it’s in those diet pills.
-
Ozempic, whatever it is, everyone’s doing Ozempic, and then we’re finding out that people are having organ failure on Ozempic, and people are changing into people they didn’t used to look like at all.
-
And organ failure is one of the things that you quickly get when you do snake venom. So, it’s a bad thing, and so recommend that people look at what they’re getting, ask about what they’re getting. Is there any snake venom or venom from other things? They use venom from all kinds of stuff. Venom is the key word.
-
in whatever the hell you’re giving me. And if not, okay, you know, whatever.
-
All right, let’s see any other things here.
-
I like to keep it.
-
short and sweet. I put this one up because I think this is some sort of repeating meme. You can tell me whether this has been
-
said before, and it’s kind of like Trump saying the war’s over, and tomorrow they say the war’s not over, of course, and the next day they say, you know, we’ve got a MOU, and we’re going to Switzerland, and
-
the whole gang’s gonna fly over at your expense, and we’re gonna send a couple of Israelis with them, and they’re gonna negotiate a deal, and have lots of good food, and spend shitloads of money on the airplane.
-
And then the next day they say the deal’s over. So this is kind of what I think this is, but I want to know. I want this to be true.
-
Oh.
-
But it seems like they’ve said this multiple times, and I’ve been caught repeating it.
-
So, we’ve got… House just passed legislation to abolish seasonal time changes, make daylight savings time permanent.
-
The bill now goes to the Senate.
-
and fully approved. That would mean no more clock changes. I think this is what they’ve done every single year is that they say the bill has to go somewhere else.
-
I read it as though, you know.
-
that had just passed legislation, and
-
And then next year, we find out that that’s not true. I mean, this seasonal change of time is…
-
is another damaging and irrational thing that we do and have to tolerate and put up with in health purposes, you know, year after year after year, and it won’t be long. It’ll be time to do it again. So is that your memory of it that they say it from time to time, and
-
We move on?
-
I’m pretty fuzzy on this one. I gotta tell you, I can’t recollect that.
-
Moves to get rid of daylight savings time, but…
-
I mean…
-
I it’s never personally bothered me much except to remember the day when you got a what leap for spring forward fall back you know then.
-
It’s a minor annoyance as far as I am concerned, but I think there can be general effects that are deleterious. I’m sure you could enumerate quite a number of reasons why it’s not a good idea.
-
Oh, I can’t. I mean, for health reasons, it creates seasonal depression. It messes up times for people when for several days, if not weeks, they don’t get the time correctly. And then, you know, it brings darkness so early that
-
you waste most of the evening. And so, anyway, the bottom line on it is, that is another one of these things that’s a burden on a…
-
On mankind, it should not exist, and and we have to keep tolerating it.
-
So, all right, well, I guess that’s pretty much it.
-
What a super, what a super assortment, Jack. I’m very impressed, delighted with the whole shebang.
-
I’d like to use several of those in my own shows myself. Good stuff, good stuff, good stuff, Jack.
-
I sent you over my article. You can publish it.
-
Yeah, yeah. Oh yeah.
-
No hide laws.
-
And,
-
We’ll go from there. All right, Jim, it’s always a pleasure. I’m glad you got back from Vegas Alive. I know what happens in Veg.
-
Well, up to you and Stephanie, too. A real pleasure, Jack, as always. Glad to be here. Glad to be back. Glad to be with you.
-
Thank you very much. We’ll talk to you soon.
-
I don’t know.
-
Thank you.